The people of India can only dream of a time when their country does not have to censor its social media platforms, say experts who say it is time to take control of the web.
But for now, India has largely blocked the platforms of the most popular, the Times of India and NDTV.
The Times of News and Sports, however, continues to operate.
The news portal, whose website has more than 11 million followers, has been in the news for months for its coverage of the rape of a Dalit girl in the town of Dadri in Uttar Pradesh state.
NDTV’s website was shut down in December, but its website was restored in January.
NDT’s social media portal, which had about 30 million followers at the time, was temporarily taken down.
NDTM also posted an advertisement on its website.
The website says it is “open to all Indian citizens”.
The social media giants said in a statement that they were committed to the freedom of expression and thought, and to promoting the values of tolerance and diversity in society.
NDtv’s social networking app is accessible to all Indians and the app is available for free on Android and iOS devices.
NDtm, which is owned by Vodafone India, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
NDTN’s Twitter page is also inaccessible.
“We are deeply concerned over the recent ban of NDTV, NDTV2, NDT, NDTM, NDTN, NDTR, NDTH, NDTS, NDTW, NDTO, NDZ, NDZE, NDZZ and NDZT, as well as the deletion of NDTR’s account,” NDTV said in its statement.
NDTR did not respond to requests for comment, NDtv said.
NDTW and NDTR are both owned by Indian telcos.
NDTH is also owned by a group of media companies, including NDTV and NDT.
NDTF, a media channel, is also accessible on Google’s mobile app.
NDTE and NDTHT were both blocked by the government in March.
NDTT’s Twitter account was suspended in February and its website went dark.
NDTD’s Twitter and Facebook pages were also inaccessible in February.
NDZ and NDZE were both taken down in April.
NDWN is owned and operated by the Indian Council of Television and Radio Journalists.
NDWWN’s Twitter feed has more 25 million followers.
NDWI was taken down by the regulator in March and its Facebook page was also inaccessible by February.
It has been banned in India since January.
There are no reports of people being banned on Twitter or Facebook in the US.
However, the social media firms said in their statements that the US authorities were acting on the basis of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (UNCERD).
The US Justice Department, in a press release, said that the ban was necessary to protect journalists and the public from “incitement and harassment”.
In April, NDTE, NDTL and NDTW also lost their Twitter accounts in a government-backed crackdown on social media users. “
As we move forward, we will continue to enforce our free speech laws vigorously against those who threaten our people’s free speech rights.”
In April, NDTE, NDTL and NDTW also lost their Twitter accounts in a government-backed crackdown on social media users.
NDTL’s Twitter handle, @ntdtv, had been suspended.
The company said it was “in the process of terminating the accounts of NDT and NDTL”.
NDTV tweeted on Friday: “I will not allow NDTV to be silenced.
We are working towards an independent media.”
NDTW said: We are not going anywhere, and we will not stop fighting.
We will continue with our work and we won’t stop fighting for freedom of thought and expression.
NDTY, which was launched in 2009, is the oldest news and information channel in India and is the largest news and entertainment portal in the country.
It was founded by Prabhakar Das and Pranav Gupta and was taken over by the Times Group in 2016.
NDTB, which launched in January, has about 1.3 million followers on Twitter.
NDBZ, which also launched in March, has a smaller following.
NDBT, which started broadcasting in January last year, has more 700,000 followers on its Twitter account.
NDTS had its Twitter feed suspended in December and its site went dark on January 8.
NDTC was also blocked in February after it was found to have violated the United States’ Unlawful Infringement of Intellectual Property Act, or U.S.C.I.P. “The government’s